The question has been framed in the streets: is a government that impoverishes healthcare and nutrition, flouts the law, enriches its officials, imprisons babies, and kills its citizens worth the money it collects, much less the respect and obedience it demands?

Democrats have nothing to lose by shutting down the government to force the majority party to respond to these questions and the one that looms over all: what, if any, is the political and moral future of the US?

    • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Personally, I think that a future incarnation of the United States can be one nation, but divided into four regions, each with their own president and branches. Western, Middle, Eastern, and Outer America. The outer region is places outside of the contiguous US, such as Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, military bases like Djibouti, Greenland, and so forth.

      These presidents can elect a Figurehead President, who heads the national executive for one term, and no more. Each region donates soldiers and other resources to the national government, and the national court is expanded to have an equal number of justices from each region. I am thinking about 21 justices - 4 from each region, and each president selecting a justice who represents their executive branch during the tenure of their president.

      This would make it much harder for any one faction to have controlling power over politics, and make genuine collaboration much more likely.

    • 4grams@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The resulting power vacuum would result in something far worse. Our best chance is to revive this dead democracy and fix the shit that allowed this to happen.

      I don’t think that’s possible though with this electorate.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      “Burn it all down” is a simplistic, unrealistic strategy. It’s said more to express frustration than to suggest serious policy.

      • altphoto@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Specially the RNC branch of the DNC. Specially important to not allow people with repeated last names or family ties to be president. There’s plenty of last names that haven’t had a turn at being president. Also we need a woman president and quick!

          • altphoto@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Very serious. The RNC branch with all their ballot conspiracy and murderous actions should step aside so that someone can fix their mess. Like when Gramps spills a glass of milk on the table because he soiled himself. Grandpa RNC just needs his fox news and a few pills. The rest of us gotta clean that shit up and move on…don’t let Gramp’s back in the kitchen. The shit economy is going to shit because of the RNC branch. Hopefully we get women candidates that are not crazy pedophiles. No more white guys for president unless we vote for them… We as in all of us not some representative assholes that the RNC can just gerrymander to get the votes they need. Stay out of the government and out of our neighborhoods.

            • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              The “evil DNC” ran two women. Progressives refused to vote for either. Funnily enough, an old white man did win.

              . The RNC branch with all their ballot conspiracy

              What ballot conspiracy?

              murderous actions

              Again, what?

              Gramps

              I find it amusing when old age suddenly becomes no big deal when we’re talking about Bernie.

              The shit economy is going to shit because of the RNC branch.

              The economy is shit because of Republicans and their idiotic tariffs. It was growing under Biden, not really sure how this criticism makes sense.

              • kreskin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 minutes ago

                The “evil DNC” ran two women. Progressives refused to vote for either. Funnily enough, an old white man did win.

                And yet progressives have hated Biden since always. The constant racism disguised as “gaffes from crazy uncle Joe-- he just doesnt understand that he’s flirting with KKK types” and his authoring civil asset forfeiture to pantomime some tough on crime shtick, and his money stream form AIPAC showed anyone that was paying attention that he was an absolute idiot. Sure some progressives votes for him in 2000 to get rid of trump, but that was because they had little choice in the matter. The “uncommitted” vote in 2024 in the dem primary was all progressives too.

                Hillary lost because of the rage around her shanking Bernie in the primary. Kamala lost because she wouldnt disavow her support for genocide and flirting with right wingers to keep progressive voices down. if you want to distill that down to simply them being female and no other reason, I guess good luck with that-- live in whatever fantasy world you need to in order to keep from experiencing any cognitive dissonance. I’m beyond caring about other peoples accusations. This is a “you” problem.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          No but nobody is deluded about the RNC being better except maga cult members (don’t take my word for it, look at the polling) and I think we can all agree reaching them is a waste of time vs organizing around creating an actual opposition party.

          • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            No but nobody is deluded about the RNC being better

            Ok, so discourage people from voting for Democrats, what happens? You support the worse (not by a little by the way, by a TON) option.

            creating an actual opposition party.

            Just like in 2016 and 2024. We’ll just make sure the government stays in Republican hands until we create out mythical perfect party. We’re so smart.

            • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyzOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              You have such a tiny worldview, but whatever go on believing that, people like you are becoming an endangered species. Your ideology allows for no change, everything is perfectly fragile and if we make any move to demand better we will certainly shatter it all as far as you are concerned.

              Save your breath and get out of the way.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    The Democrats faux concerned the air traffic controllers not working and not being paid, to kowtow to the Republicans in the last shutdown. The Dems had its members “break rank” who happened to be politicians, whose election won’t be coming soon or are retiring. The Democrats will pull the same manipulative tactics. They won’t be in this game for so long if they are not that devious.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The Democrats faux concerned the air traffic controllers not working and not being paid

      What’s the “faux concern”? Have you given any thought at all to what it would mean if air traffic controllers weren’t working?

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        You know how Lemmy loves to bring up the trolley problem? Furloughing air traffic controllers for couple of weeks is less bad, than the effects of cutting Medicare to millions, and giving funds to ICE to brutalise America’s own citizens, which are far more consequential and far reaching, and will be felt by an entire society for generations to come.

  • JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago
    1. Shut down the US government.
    2. Each state puts forth a new constitution elevating themselves to country status.
    3. Form a new North American Union (like the EU) with Canada as Daddy
    4. ???
    5. Profit
    • Sabata@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Each state puts forth a new constitution elevating themselves to country status.

      I hope my state can successfully wage war against every state to the south of it.

    • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      While my theory is based on various sci-fi so should be taken with a mine of salt, my guess is that USA will split into three different countries: NUSA (lol Cyberpunk) which will comprise of the original 13 colony states and the upper North East, The California Republic which will essentially be the West and NW and in good relations with NUSA but with different legislature, and the South which might be called anything from Texas, New Texas, Republic of Texas, or New Louisiana Territory, which will essentially be a war-torn area full of religious extremists not unlike Middle-Eastern areas after the West had their way with them. It will be full of forever wars by religious factions funded by the MIC shareholders of various other countries but in the public face it’ll be covered by the media as religious extremism and/or patriotic fanaticism while ignoring the material reality and history of the situation.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        The south could bring slavery and cousin/sister shagging back like they have always wanted. I say let them have their theocracy. We build a wall around the enture south and make it into a reality tv show for the world. and, profit.

        When season 45 ends we can then just give whatever rubble is left to cuba to figure out.

      • Triasha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        In the American Civil War the North had the advantage in Navy, population, wealth, and industrial power.

        Now those advantages in population and industrial capacity are flipped. In the scenario you project the south could devolve into infighting and hollow out, but a single charismatic figure could unite them, and that would pose a terrible threat to the NEUSA and the Cali Republic. Have you read Rurtledove’s American Front?

        • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I have not read that, no. I have heard of the series before though.

          Does the South really have those things flipped? Does the South really have more of a population that the East and West coasts combined? More land area sure, but aren’t they currently at the economic mercy of the East and West coasts?

          • Triasha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 minutes ago

            The red states are net takers compared to federal. Taxes paid. In this hypothetical civil conflict all sides are materially worse off but the south would be worst by a margin. Material deprivation by the general populace can end a war, but it doesn’t always.

            See Russia in Ukraine for an example.

            Where the lines are matters, whether Ohio and Michigan are in the NEUS or the south makes a big difference in population and industry.

        • Taldan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It really depends on what type of war this hypothetical civil war would be, and who would be included in each side. North Dakota has nukes, is in the North, but also is very conservative. Opposite scenario for New Mexico

          Realistically, a conventional war isn’t possible these days. In digital warfare, tech hubs like NYC, DC, Cali, and Washington become the most important locations

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      2 would mostly only happen in red states. The rest mostly know how to cooperate.

      And you know that California doesn’t need Canada, even less when you consider the rest of the US west coast in with it.

    • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Some states have proven that, without federal intervention, they cannot effectively govern themselves. Texas, for instance…

      • Triasha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Texas would last long enough to be dangerous to it’s neighbors. I would not want to be in New Mexico if federal power breaks down.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Probably better to form an analogy to the old European Coal and Steel Community rather than to jump directly into an EU equivalent, also bring Mexico in since without the US being a thing they’ll end up with the largest population on the continent.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Prolly. Doesn’t mean I shouldn’t point out viability, fate has a strange way of twisting and if it so decides I would rather have the idea spread than for it to not. Who knows perhaps someone will read my comment and spread it further or be in a position to enact.

    • ferretfacefrankburns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Canada doesn’t want to babysit you guys. Seriously, every time a yankee doodle dipshit proposes Canada to take over some US states, it just sounds like immature fuckups who don’t want to take responsibility for yourself and move out of your parent’s basement.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      How is he a traitor? We’ll never hold the majority again having to deal with you guys. You just don’t care. “Win” (you won’t) at all costs.

  • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    23 hours ago

    If you don’t feel like your representatives are adequately representing you (God knows I don’t), this is a good time to find a primary candidate to support (monetarily or with your time) - or even file to run yourself. Every house representative is up for reelection in November.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    But the Democrats insist that it wasn’t working, so naturally we have to let the fascist murdering Republicans do whatever the fuck they want!

  • zd9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Shut it the fuck down until the weasels in the GOP actually have their arm twisted to engage with empathy. I’d be personally affected by a shutdown, but it’s a sacrifice I’d make for a long time if it means any kind of progress against the fucking fascist pedophile protectors in office.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    22 hours ago

    No taxation without representation. We know Trump/ Elon / Putin hacked the election. This is NOT the will of the American people. Cut them off of our tax dollars. They want small government so bad, see what they can do without revenue from blue cities/ states.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No, we don’t live in fantasy land. That could only work on a very small scale and even then, there are political leaders.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      IIRC, he’s starting negotiations in the middle and is eager to give up even more.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Man, I wish Democrats were the heartless, scheming, cut-throat, socialist maniacs that I was told they were growing up in a Republican household…

        The country would be in much better shape if it were true…

        • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Here’s the thing, they are, possibly even better than republicans, they’re taking the same corporate pro israel bribe money, they just didn’t also align themselves with the insane neo Nazis, Christian terrorists, and loudmouth idiots.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            You forgot the part where I said “socialist.” I don’t want them to be heartless and scheming if they’re not doing it for socialist reforms.

            • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              13 hours ago

              You are correct, I did in fact miss that. Shouldn’t be trying to be thoughtful while I’m in bed trying to sleep 😅

              And hell yeah, the only reform is socialist reform. It’s unfortunate that the party is almost all corpo Dems, definitely needs more push from the left