• CuriousRefugee@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Fair enough, and I wish she was elected over Trump because she was the only other contender. But is she actually the best choice for 2028? The Democrats’ bench sucks, but there are still people I’d prefer over her (who could hopefully actually win a primary). I might take her over Newsome, though.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Sigh, The left hates genocide supporters, we admit it.

          You caught us! This guy was too clever for us and found out the secret we never talk about! How did you figure it out, genius?

    • bigfish@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Because the DNC decided to go with (checks notes) the easiest to run centrist candidate who happened to already be there.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Most people are centrists and Harris was able to get Biden’s campaign money.

        Anyone else would have had to start off with no money three months before the election.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Most people are centrists

          Most people have random contradictory views. Triangulating your policy to be more “centrist” by reducing its scale, adding market mechanisms, and means-testing doesn’t make it appeal to everyone who isn’t extreme left or right, it makes it appeal to nobody.

            • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              18 hours ago

              He was running after 4 years of Trump. And after a primary and events in 2020 that got low-information voters believing democrats supported free healthcare/college, abolishing ICE, continuing covid protections, etc.

              • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                17 hours ago

                People who compare Biden to Clinton and Harris and see gender as the difference are missing the much more obvious difference in that Trump was the (chaotic) status quo. Every election except for Obama 2 has been a “this sucks, do something else”. Biden won, because he was something else, but he didn’t do nearly as well as he should have and he was cruising for a loss in 2024 even before his brain leaked live on stage.

                And while that would point toward better odds for an uninspiring moderate, I do expect we’ll be in danger of vote suppression and manipulation and can’t trust simple “change” to push literally anyone over the finish line.

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Biden turned the economy around and crafted some beautiful policies it was the low-information voters who couldn’t see that and believed that both parties are the same.

        • MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Incoherent cultural views don’t equal the political centrism of liberal coastal elites which skews tepid and corporate.

          What most people care about is the bottom line i.e. affordability. Centrists just don’t have an appealing answer to that since they are so beholden to capital.

          This is not to say the far right isn’t beholden to capital as well, but they’re shameless enough to campaign on affordability anyway and it’s a huge reason why Trump won.

    • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Not really no. Every other human on the planet was equally as likely to be president as Harris, and they all put in about as much effort as Harris and the DNC did.

        • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          No. The democratic party had 75 million votes.

          Not the candidate.

          Not one single living self aware human being supported Harris running. Harris didn’t even support Harris running hence why she showed up sloppy drunk to almost press conference.

          She was literally one of the worst possible options.