The Pennsylvania senator dismissed the demand for further investigation as “moot.”

Senator John Fetterman appeared not to understand why Democrats want to investigate the deadly strike that killed dozens of Iranian children.

During an interview with CNN’s Kaitlan Collins Wednesday night, Fetterman was asked to explain why he hadn’t signed onto a letter from Senate Democrats that questioned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on the February 28 strike on Shajarah Tayyebeh, a girls’ primary school miles from Tehran. The strike killed 175 people, many of them young girls.

“Well, because we all agree that it’s a tragedy having the school hit, and we all agree now for an investigation,” Fetterman said. “What I don’t agree with the rest of my colleagues in the House is that it’s a war of choice, or it’s dumb, or all the things my colleagues have described, you know, this operation. I think it’s a good thing, and I support that.”

Fetterman was referring to a line in the letter describing Donald Trump’s military campaign as “a war of choice without Congressional authorization.” The letter did not describe the war as “dumb.”

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    If the Democrats were a functioning opposition party, they would have forced Fetterman out when his staffers started reporting his erratic behavior. But Chuck Schumer needs Senators to, “go against him,” and thwart any legitimate opposition the party can muster, so we let this brain damaged, mentally ill man occupy one of fhe highest positions of power in the nation.

  • AreaSIX @lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fetterman, Randy Fine, Trump, Lindsey Graham, Rubio, Ted Cruz. It’s amazing to think about how his gallery of absolute revolting ghouls have all received the majority of votes in an election in the US. The American public have preferred these freaks to whatever was the alternative.

    I don’t know how the US can be salvaged. At the minimum, a massive portion of the country needs to be sent to reeducation camps.

  • James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The headline is misquoting him, the full quote is:

    “Well, because we all agree that it’s a tragedy having the school hit, and we all agree now for an investigation,” Fetterman said. “What I don’t agree with the rest of my colleagues in the House is that it’s a war of choice, or it’s dumb, or all the things my colleagues have described, you know, this operation. I think it’s a good thing, and I support that.”

    Still glaringly stupid, but the headline makes it seem like he’s in denial it happened. He didn’t say the words “leftist” or “craze”

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      4 days ago

      Appreciate this.

      Trump’s political supporters say and do enough batshit, immoral things that we don’t need to be lying just to make our points.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      He did say the word “leftist”. He doesn’t say crazed, but he does say:

      “The Leftist media seem more angry and talking about the deaths of these dead school girls than they were about Iran killing tens of thousands of their own young people a couple of weeks ago”

      The clip is here: https://x.com/Acyn/status/2031906677365358825

      All I did was search the rest of the article for the term “leftist” notice it was used, then goto the link the New Republic provided. The question the interviewer is posing is why did all the Senate Democrats signed a letter condemning the US action in Iran except for John Fetterman.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      It is, indeed.

      FFS, even saying a “dozen dozens“ would be underselling the actual death toll of that particular war crime.

      The world honestly would be a (slightly) better place if that stroke was just a smidge more fatal…

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Does anyone on any side think this brain-damaged flip-flopper has anything important to say?

  • FatCrab@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Jfc, it’s so unfortunate his stroke was caught in time to save his Phineas Gage ass.

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 days ago

      Looking back, it’s like what the fuck, it was this guy or Dr Oz? Like did Pennsylvania even actually have a choice?

      • foodandart@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 days ago

        He was a lot less insufferable before the stroke.

        Brain injuries absolutely DO change people.

        • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Unfortunately he wasn’t. He was a dick before the stroke he just had an incredible campaign/PR team that managed to successfully spin him as a progressive. I learned about him summarized in this video

          23 minutes in i get Ahmaud Arbery vibes when he pulled a gun on a complete stranger.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          There’s a fan theory about the show King of the Hill.

          I think it was season 2 that Peggy Hill went sky diving. The parachute doesn’t open, and she seeminly falls to her death. Except then you find out that she survived, and is now in a full body cast.

          Fans noticed that before those events she wasn’t very aggressive, or stuborn, or stupid. But after the fall, those are the traits that would define her character going forward.

          The theory is, the brain damage from the fall changed her. And thats a good in show way of saying “the writers hadn’t found her personality yet”.

      • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 days ago

        They blame the stroke he had just before the 2024 primary for his personality change, but there were clues that this was really him all along. Another excuse I’ve seen which I find slightly more believable (but only because the groundwork for it was already there) is that he became highly dependent upon social media - and thereby more radicalized - after his stroke prevented him from communicating normally.

        • MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          His “brain injury” was indeed caused by a stroke. It was the stroke of a pen, signing off on that big, fat check that someone gave him in exchange for his vote.