I’ll be covering the Iran war extensively, subscribe so you don’t miss any updates

In a rebuke of his own party’s rhetoric, congressman Eric Swalwell said this weekend, “Now is the time for values-based arguments against war with Iran,” adding: “NOT process (‘Come to Congress’) ones.”

His point is well taken, but I’m skeptical that the opposition to the strike is focused on the machine that made it inevitable, instead of focused on Trump individually.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    73·
    12 days ago

    "I don’t know if this is technically a war,” Senator Lindsay Graham said of the un-war in Iran on Meet the Press on Sunday.

    …

    But it is not just Trump loyalists who are playing word games. Democrats also have a hard time calling this what it is, with the party’s top officials using terms like “Military attack,” “military operation,” “military assault,” and the like.

    Sen. Chuck Schumer says the strikes are “risking wider conflict”; Rep. Hakeem Jeffries says the operation has “brought us to the brink of a possible war.”

    What a revolting display of writhing human invertebrates.

      • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
        14·
        12 days ago

        If the Dems called it full-on war, you’d say they’re stoking full-on war. They can do nothing right if you decided long ago they do nothing right… which is exactly what the GOP propaganda machine has been encouraging you to think.

        • dazzlingclitgame@lemmy.world
          7·
          12 days ago

          It’s not like the Dems are innocent when it comes to bombing the ME.

          The Dems can do nothing right because they no longer work for the working class. They are beholden to their donors and that’s clear as day to many of us.