• Aequitas@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    433
    ·
    10 days ago

    Relevant:

    "Entrepreneurship is like one of those carnival games where you throw darts or something.

    Middle class kids can afford one throw. Most miss. A few hit the target and get a small prize. A very few hit the center bullseye and get a bigger prize. Rags to riches! The American Dream lives on.

    Rich kids can afford many throws. If they want to, they can try over and over and over again until they hit something and feel good about themselves. Some keep going until they hit the center bullseye, then they give speeches or write blog posts about “meritocracy” and the salutary effects of hard work.

    Poor kids aren’t visiting the carnival. They’re the ones working it."

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yeah that is real nail on the head stuff. The poverty trap is real. I really believe everyone should be poor once in their life for at least a year with no end in sight because many / most who haven’t experienced it don’t have the empathetic capacity to imagine it.

        • Sludge@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          Having the bottom fall out really changes your perspective. Folks need to have empathy and I have a strong sensation that those well off don’t realize that most of us are a few missed paychecks or a medical emergency away from being destitute.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 days ago

      A coworker of mine left to start his own startup. He claimed that the IPO of an old employer gave him a little bit of cushion to work with, and he was going to take his shot. I wished him well. It was a crazy dumb app idea. But you never know.

      I do remember thinking “gee and he just had a baby too, what a time to take a risk.” I later learned that he had married old money. The second he had a kid with her, he couldn’t lose.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      In addition to the multiple throws, and in addition to the direct nepotistic help, there is also just the osmosis effect. How many people would give their right arm to get basic mentoring from Bill Gates? Just knowing someone who’s succeeded at something gives you a massive cultural window into that thing and how to nail it. This kid is delusional. If she wants to do something totally on her own she should be a movie director or race car driver or flower arranger. What’s that? Starting up a tech company? Ohh… how original.

  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    209
    ·
    10 days ago

    no ties to my privilege

    it’s an AI startup

    $185 million

    Something does not compute, in a Microslop sort of way.

    • ConstableJelly@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      9 days ago

      “I have a chip on my shoulder,” she said, describing her drive to prove she can win over private equity in Silicon Valley based on merit, not inheritance or legacy …[T]he young founder hasn’t taken money from her parents for Phia. Instead, she’s insisted on raising outside capital even as some investors remain fixated on her personal life instead of her business venture.

      I appreciate the sentiment, but it would be delusional to think her ability to “win over private equity” was divorced at all from her father’s legacy and last name. And actually, I’m not sure I appreciate the sentiment. In 2026, merit is way down the list, like scrawled sideways in the margins, of things that matter to private equity.

      • CogitoCool@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 days ago

        It’s certainly delusional. I’ve been active in the innovation space for ~25 years, and for most normal people it’s taking a massive risk. Here, she’s not ending-up on the street if the venture flops, so the risk is low.

        So merit my ass, it’s easy to take a risk if it’s not real risk, i.e. I agree and don’t appreciate the sentiment.

        • Donkter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          Real question: what on earth does “on the street” mean in the tech startup world? Because I have a strong suspicion that “on the street” means just going to work a normal job like 300 million other people even despite personal anecdotes of one or two people who literally became homeless.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Wonder how much of her funding came from people who rape kids with her dad…

    If she thinks she’s doing anything that her name doesn’t benefit, she’s fucking stupider than most AI ceos and that’s saying a lot.

    Maybe even stupid enough to not know the reason her dad’s company took off is her grandparents worked for Xerox and just gave him a bunch of IP including the first computer mouse and a shit ton of money.

    The Gates family is a nepo family, they’re just all too stupid to understand and legitimately think they have the same opportunities as anyone else.

    • Lena@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      10 days ago

      Think of how stupid the average AI CEO is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.

    • Zephorah@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      9 days ago

      If you ever listen to Behind the Bastards, then you’ll notice a pattern of emotional stunting in the growth of billionaires. The kids that have the money straight away, not the ones that really do make it themselves wherever they are.

      Exemplar: Elon.

      Though the imagery that sticks out in my mind is one of Zuckerberg playing mall ninja in his original office space, as the boss, walking around with a samurai sword and fake swiping at employees with it.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        9 days ago

        None of them make it themselves…

        But they act like spoiled kids because that’s how everyone treats them, because at that level of wealth the only people you’re around will say whatever gets you to give them money.

        It doesn’t take long before they forget how to be a normal human

        • Zephorah@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          9 days ago

          People who talk to you like an AI bot. Maybe that’s why the AI talks that way. It’s all they know.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 days ago

            Never thought of that, but yeah…

            Especially for Elon, it’s not just people in person, he bought twitter just to have his own echo chamber

            When grok constantly glazes him, that’s what he thinks a normal person acts like. If it acts like a human would, Elmo can’t recognize it.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Is this the same entitled bitch who got a $1,000,000 ranch as a present?

    Maybe pay some fucking taxes, Phoebe.

  • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    9 days ago

    Phoebe Gates wants her $185 million AI startup to succeed with ‘no ties to my privilege or my last name’

    But you have no problem with the $35 million they gave you? That’s part of your privilege. You say you want to succeed without it while stuffing your pockets with it.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      shes basically like the rich people that think they are independant and living on thier own, but thier parents give them a credit card to do pay whatever she wants on her own,.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      If she really wants to show the world how good she is, and non-privileged, she can change her name, get into community college while working a minimum wage job, and then start a multimillion dollar business on her own from her savings, without getting carried through life by her father.

  • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    9 days ago

    She just wants to be treated like any other totally unqualified person whose mom gave her commencement speed and got handed 100 million dollars to start up a made up company.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      9 days ago

      That then told everyone about her company, that she doesn’t want any privilege in promoting, to her many followers.

    • AxExRx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 days ago

      I hope in 10 years we find out shes secretly a cyborg and meant that litterally, the prototype chip is on (in) her shoulder.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    9 days ago

    To be fair to whoever she is, it must have been impossible for them to not to have grown up completely bonkers out of touch. Not without some serious awesome parenting.

    Which is why she did not.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    “Child of prominent pedophile has an AI startup” is such a vibe right now.

  • manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 days ago

    The featured article under this is titled

    Hailey Bieber and Kris Jenner back Phoebe Gates’ fashion tech startup Phia in $8 million seed round

    hilarious stuff

  • thesmokingman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    9 days ago

    The shopping assistant plugs into browsers like Chrome and Safari to compare prices and surface deals across tens of thousands of retail and resale sites in real time. It essentially serves as your own personal deal finder: Say you’re looking at a $200 dress from Anthropologie, Phia can find and compare prices at secondhand sellers to help customers find a better price.

    Gates and Kianni first brainstormed startup ideas in their Stanford dorm room, cycling through concepts before landing on a consumer tool that included Gates’ interest in women’s empowerment (likely modeled after her own mother) and Kianni’s sustainability focus.

    I don’t think a coupon tool that wastes excessive resources is either empowering or sustainable.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’d be surprised if there’s actual AI behind it. That functionality already exists and works just fine.

      • thesmokingman@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’d be surprised if a human were behind it. This is exactly the kind of thing that can be vibe coded pretty fast and is mostly just reselling fancy Google searches through an LLM. I did a quick skim of the website and it’s just a bunch of items scraped from big brands with lots of similar looking images of other products. There’s too many sites for me to really believe they’ve made integrations with all of them.

        The insane valuation is because of her name not because the tech is good. The only way to make money on this is the customer data. The margin on that is going to be fucking minuscule especially once LLM costs start going up so they can make money. This adds nothing of value on top so it will go away almost immediately.

          • thesmokingman@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Ohhhhhh yeah this is just 100% LLM garbage. No machine learning. Forgive me; I don’t often talk to people that understand the difference so my default is human vs LLM not LLM vs <insert something AI that isn’t LLM>. Trying to explain machine learning vs LLM summaries to data company business executives wears you down.

            Edit: also my frame of mind was on the more recent Waymo “our AI just goes to a human when it’s hard” news that followed the Amazon “it was always a Mechanical Turk” news which is why I jumped to human.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’d be concerned about monied motives driving suggestions. Even if it starts out neutral, how can we as consumers be sure it won’t become corrupted? Enshittification is par for the course these days, I’d be extremely wary about relying on an app to tell me real, unbiased price info unless its mechanisms and sources are (and remain) completely transparent.

  • oh_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 days ago

    With what money did she start the business then? Get the F out of here with that crap. Also, so original, going into AI like everyone else.