The plan, which is not finalized, suggests children get fewer shots and shifts to a model telling parents to consult doctors to make their own vaccine choices.

The goal of course is a bunch of sick and dead kids. Because quacks make more money that way.

Access options:

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, I think the suggestion that insurance companies wouldn’t cover them is crazy. It will be significantly more expensive for them to cover widespread illness than vaccines. Everything is money to them. Shit, there could be incontrovertible proof vaccines cause autism, and insurance companies would say hey, it’s cheaper than measles, you must do it or we won’t cover you.

      • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        They will only cover them if it’s profitable, otherwise, they won’t if they’re not forced to

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The big expenses from getting Hepatitis B happen a decade or more from when you get the infection. A different insurer picks up the tab if you decline to cover vaccination.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They always look beyond the next quarter. Thata kind of their whole thing actually, finding the leaks risky things to insure so they never have to pay out.