Those 50%, or 27% will NOT vote for a woman, no matter what. Therefore, a women candidate will be trying to be first past the post with only 50%, or 73%, of the vote available to her, at most. It is far too great a handicap to bear, at a time when losing is not an option. Learn to read the room.
LOL? Get a grip on reality, Cletus!
You are wrong. This is literally the worst time to be offering up a “first time for…” candidate. The stakes are way too high to run that experiment. I love AOC and think she’d be a fine president, but at this time of hate and misogyny, she is too great a risk.
Oh, I’d bet there will be shenanigans, but as I understand it, everything unclassified must be released in a searchable and downloadable form. Obviously, they will “classify” everything they don’t want out, and I bet there will be a metric ton of redactions.
Congress just (almost) unanimously passed a law, one of very few this Congress has passed, that the Epstein Files must be released by this coming Friday.
The extremely welcome and greatly anticipated death of Donny 2 Inches, does not change that law…!
They will keep supporting him regardless.
Don’t look to Fox for any sort of epiphany.
Despite your feelings, these are the people voting. If you offer a woman candidate, you will effectively freeze out the misogynistic 30% (approximately, don’t @me ) of the possible vote for that woman, and unless there is a literal Blue tidal wave of historic proportion, she ain’t getting past the post first. It is reality, currently, and I’m sorry your feelings don’t like it. Mine don’t either, but now is not the time for gender equality in the presidency. In this climate, a female candidate will be a liability. Did you not see how the last 2 Dem women candidates performed…?