But the IDs are reused, they can really only track you while you’re using the internet.

The mainstream media want to destroy the competition.

Apple DOS was on a disk. There wasn’t really any OS, you operated the computer through the BASIC interpreter.

Which entity/organisation/individual/company are they getting the ideas from?

The mainstream media.

From the article it appears to be some technical experiment in Spain they were too disorganised or lazy to remove from the ROM.

No this is totally about race.

Very few Uber drivers are caucasian.

How can they fire them ?

They’re not employing them to look pretty you know.

No one will create content without ad revenue. Peertube is doomed to fail.

That’s the point, Uber can’t get any women drivers so they are offering this. It’s got nothing to do with “empowerment”.

Meta have paid the copyright fee but uploaded material from Ann’s Archive because it wasn’t financially feasible to scan in each book individually.

Fair use is irrelevant.

The term “America” was coined for south america.

The english then called the northern continent “North America” because they were lazy.

He did have a backup. This is why you use cloud storage.

The operator had to contact Amazon Business support, which helped restore the data within about a day.

There was no regime change in Venezuela, the same people are running the place.

Iran gives Donnie a gold painted yacht and a choice of Ayatollahs (it a title you know, not a person) and the US will walk away.

People seem to have forgotten the only reason she was the candidate was because Biden dropped out and she was the VP.

She got practically no votes in the primaries.

The Dunkin’ Donut 48 fl.oz. bucket contains 600 mg of caffeine.

The recommended US maximum is 400 mg per day.

If it doesn’t generate a token you won’t be able to access the site.

It literally only requires a single bit flag.

This will make it more anonymous because verification relies on a token defined in the OS rather than uploading identification.

There’s no reason at all the “journalist” in question here should have had an AI generated anything for his shitty article.<

Except that there is a requirement in Conde Nast to use AI.

As a journalist it’s your whole fucking job to do the research and report things accurately and truthfully.<

That is what the AI is supposed to be for.

They can’t have it both ways - either they demand AI and accept the consequences, or they give sufficient resources to staff to complete their work without it.

The whole point of using AI is that its a search tool and that is the verification.

Otherwise there’s no point in using it.

And you can guarantee Conde Nast demands journalists use AI all the time.