Eh, tomato/potato, the ‘genocide joe’ mantra and then immediately turning that hate on Harris when he stepped down, essentially demanding an ethically pure option…
It all ends up in the same place, a disenfranchised apathetic public leaving the door open for the current shitshow whose voters eagerly embrace the terrible options they’re offered. Perfect being the enemy of the less bad and all that.
Yeah, and the legitimate lefties out there are awesome and I hope they get their way.
Then there are the ones who preach disengagement because “both sides” / “blue-maga”…
Oddly enough I’ve seen the purported progressives on here already trying to claim he’s bad on a few occasions.
Right, and if both sides have their public ally routable IPs on their respective firewalls it’ll work. If on gets put behind a NAT of some sort then it would be able to speak outward, but would require specific packet routing inward (port forwarding) to have someone connect in. Stateful sessions will be fine so long as the one inside a NAT is the initiator.
If only one side is behind a NAT then so long as that one initiates the tunnel it should work fine. NAT only really is a problem on the inbound side.
She was recently endorsed as by the furniture builders union as being the only couch safe candidate. Now she’s sitting pretty…