This is literally 100% the reason why a jury of your peers exists.
The founding fathers went through a system where dipshits like Stephen Miller could just make up whatever they wanted, and the people had no role, and they fought a whole war to cancel that system. They knew exactly what was up with it.
Edit: If, by some chance, you wind up on a jury where this comes up, just pretend you’ve never heard of it. Even having heard the term, or understanding the concept, will almost certainly get you disqualified from the jury. You can do the exact same process of deciding that it’s a bunch of bullshit that whatever person is being accused of whatever when it’s pretty obvious that they were not the one in the wrong, without it being called “jury nullification.” It’s just justice, it’s just common sense, like I said it is the whole intent of having a jury.
It’s always the same with these guys:
When they’re winning, it’s ruthless and relentless, everything you get is your fault, and you’re a fool and a dipshit if you don’t get on board.
As soon as things start not going their way, they start the waterworks. It’s all unfair, it’s horrible, how could people be so mean to us. Don’t they believe in all of our common humanity? How could they?