Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez holds a slight lead over Vice President JD Vance in a hypothetical 2028 presidential matchup, according to a new poll.

The New York Democratic congresswoman, known as AOC, edges the likely Republican nominee 51% to 49%, in The Argument/Verasight survey released on Tuesday. However, the result was within the poll’s 2.7 percentage point margin of error, making the two candidates statistically tied. The poll asked voters who they would vote for if the election was between the two of them.

  • Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    And yet it’s elected centrist man after centrist man. Funny, that.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The last time there was another option on the table he became the first black president in our nation’s history. Perhaps there’s a lesson to be learned there.

      • Ech@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I think it’s a stretch to say Obama wasn’t centrist, but really it’s irrelevant. US voters were fine with voting in centrist men in if they were appealing enough, but once a centrist woman is put up, they’ll let a self-confessed wannabe dictator into office with hardly a fight.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Obama certainly acted like a centrist but that’s not how he campaigned which means that’s not what won him the election.

          • Ech@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Again, irrelevant. Also, he won twice, so his initial campaign wasn’t the end all be all, either.

            • krashmo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              It’s only irrelevant if you’re intentionally ignoring facts which disagree with your conclusion

              • Ech@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Nope. It doesn’t disagree with anything, it’s just irrelevant. Two admittedly centrist women missed the vote to the most vile candidate possible, while countless centrist men won to slightly farther right opponents. That math is crystal clear, and Obama’s first election has no bearing on that.