I feel like that’s probably the one thing a vehicle marketed as bullet-proof needs to be… like, actually bullet-proof.

  • DeICEAmerica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    Wait until the first LEO can’t get out of one of these when it catches on fire.

    Musk will STILL be treated with kid gloves. We simply cannot hold billionaires to the same standards.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    31 minutes ago

    Wait, people didn’t know that?

    Various guntubers and social media influencers have been shooting up cybertrucks for like, 2 years now.

    Yeah, it might stop an average pistol round from a moderate distance.

    Close up? Probably not as much.

    More serious, higher velocity pistol round? Also not so much.

    Hits the glass? Yeah that shit ain’t bulletproof at all.

    Rifle round? Swiss cheese.

    … I’m confused people weren’t already widely aware of the cybertruck’s near total non-bulletproofness.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Yeah. A vehicle known for trapping occupants when damaged, then burning them alive. Are you sure that’s the kind of vehicle you want to be in when it gets shot at?

  • OhioComrade@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Ready for Blues Brothers 2

    To pursue the Blues Brothers, filmmakers bought more than 60 old police cars at $400 [ $1,573 today] apiece, according to news reports at the time

  • Bakkoda@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I need more proof. I don’t believe they aren’t, someone prove it.

  • obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    24 hours ago

    It probably doesn’t matter if they are actually bulletproof. They’ll be used as propaganda show cars, or personal vehicles for the brass, and never called into actual service.

    No one in their right mind is going to pick the “bulletproof” cybertruck over an armored Bearcat in a scenario where they expect to be shot at. For non-tactical applications they’re no more or less bulletproof than a standard potrol vehicle.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      For non-tactical applications they’re no more or less bulletproof

      You sure about that? I mean, they’re made of thin stainless steel glued to a plastic shell.

      • obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yeah. Any car that isn’t armored should be assumed 0% bulletproof. I wouldn’t trust a car door to protect me from a .22.

        The engine block is the only thing on a regular cop car that would reliably stop, deflect, or at least slow most bullets.

  • VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Fun facts I’ve gathered up…

    • 10 Cybertrucks were donated to Las Vegas police.
    • Las Vegas haven’t noted whether to keep or sell them.
    • Any vehicle going into police duty must be “upfitted” aka upgraded with a police package (lights, siren, comms, armor, etc).
    • Police prefer a certain known standard performance vehicle specs for duty (horsepower, towing, speed, mass, manuvrrability, etc). Teslas are too young to have demonstrated anything of this.
    • Some out-of-spec police cars (e.g.- retired, siezed, donated) might get another use as community outreach vehicles (D.A.R.E. cars).
    • Article states an upfitting company named UP.FIT {corrected name} Las Vegas, aka UNPLUGGED PERFORMANCE ®. They are not a preferred public service vehicle upfitter, as they ONLY modify Teslas and only Teslas for contract.
    • Sheriff McMahill is an uneducated media regurgitator.
    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Wait they’re still doing DARE after it was shown to increase drug use among teens?

      DARE is where I learned to make crack, and made my list of drugs I wanted to try.

      • VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        DARE in wikipedia…
        “…In 2002, D.A.R.E. had an annual budget of over $10 million…”
        “…in 2012. The new program is called “Keepin’ it REAL” and focuses less on lectures and more on interactive activities, such as practicing refusal and saying no to pressure.[9] It is now less explicitly focused on opposition to drugs, with the broader aim of teaching good decision-making…”

      • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        19 hours ago

        A sociology professor of mine worked her first job for Rand. Her assignment was to determine the effectiveness of DARE. She found that it was only effective on eighth grade boys. Rand thanked her, paid her, and shelved the report, because this was the Reagan era.

        • P00ptart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          So many reports of studies have been shelved by companies, let alone the government. It’d be fascinating to go through them.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It brings in money, so of course they’re keeping it alive. They’re trying to rebrand it, supposedly helping kids avoid standard teen stuff like suicide, etc. They had a table set up outside of Walgreens a while back. They were well-trained and aggressive, but I’ve spent a lifetime in sales, much of it training people for that same kind of bullshit, so I have no problem blowing them off. Politely, I’m not a monster, but…No thanks.

  • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The funny thing about them not being bulletproof will be the batteries getting pierced setting off a fire while they’re locked in.