[A]lso after Charlie Kirk’s death, the Heritage Foundation twisted data to claim that “50% of all major (non-gang-related) school shootings since 2015 have involved or likely involved transgender ideology.” That was in an effort to get the FBI to create a new domestic terror threat category for “Transgender Ideology-Inspired Extremism.”
How much longer until they decide to just round up the transgender people with the Gestapo ICE? It’s getting scary for transgender people.
Too bad Harris was so . . . whatever it was she was. At least we don’t have to deal with incremental progress.
Did she even run on it? Didn’t do much to prevent the abortion bounties https://www.npr.org/2022/07/11/1107741175/texas-abortion-bounty-law
She did not, in fact, run for office in Texas. Good news there too, trump created more house seats there to ensure continued ratfuckery. And she didn’t run on that either! Gosh. So terrible.
She also didn’t run for incremental progress forward, or the Biden administration do much to stop anti abortion laws.
Just like how dems never did anything to make Roe v Wade into law
The only progressive things that have ever happened have been through the Dems. (Social Democrats? No. Greens? No. Piggy Party? Uh, no. ONLY the Democrats.) You want me to go dig up the various efforts to make it into law? I would except for one thing: You’re a bad faith actor with nothing to stand on, and it’d just waste my time. Again. So Pffthhhthth.
Excellent rebuttal. Really showing great arguments
As if any would ever make a difference to you. You’re open to nothing, bad-faith debating only with the single purpose of keeping republicans in power.
And we’re back to critics of the dnc are just republicans!
No, no not at all. Working to advance any concrete political goals is not the Lemmyleft™ way.
It’s just that you support the republicans at every turn by undermining any Democratic progress. Not that you are republicans. That would be too much investment.
So in bed with the war criminal Cheneys. Yeah, it’s too bad there wasn’t a viable alternative to Trump, but that’s what you get with despicable corrupt DNC.
She should run again with Hillary on the ticket.
God forbid. They’d want to implement a women’s health amendment. Or universal healthcare. Or *shudder* progressive environmental policies! Oh the huge manatee!
lol that’s hilarious if you actually believe any of that would happen under corpo rule by those two.
Yeah they seem to think that :(
I do, yeah. But here’s the difference: I understand there are mechanics involved not just waving a magic wand and clicking our heels together.
There’s a massive difference in those thinking it’s a magic wand and those who see there’s no desire for them to even try to implement them.
But then we have so many that believe just burying heads in sand at the flaws in the dem party. Case in point your entire account in anything remotely political
Yeah you lie. We know. Feel free to stop engaging with me. kthx.
https://media.tenor.com/8t1onj9cfkQAAAAM/forest-gump-wave.gif
Look up Hillarycare. We’ll wait.
Oooo “corpo rule” sounds very cyber.
Srs tho it’s all about the votes. Slaver’s college keeps it just out of reach and then we get what we get and you lot decide it must be “corpo rule”. When anyone could just shut up and run. Lookit - how many of you are actually trying for office? . . none? Looks like none.
That is until the “claim” of someone like Mamdani before disowning him for being less than 100% pure. The “left” as represented here is just not serious. Spoilers only. FSB bots. Heels. Haters. Nothing useful.