President accuses corporation of ‘intentionally, maliciously and deceptively’ editing speech in Panorama broadcast

Donald Trump has filed a lawsuit against the BBC over its editing of a speech he made to supporters in Washington before they stormed the US Capitol in 2021, requesting up to $10bn in damages.

The US president alleged the broadcaster “intentionally, maliciously, and deceptively” edited his 6 January speech before the insurrection, in an episode of Panorama just over a year ago.

In a complaint filed on Monday evening, Trump sought $5bn in damages each on two counts: alleging that the BBC defamed him, and that they violated Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

  • sucoiri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Does any (sane) person think the edit is that egregious? To me it just looked like standard speech editing, trimming out filler and fluff and putting the two important talking points next to each other. Didn’t change the spirit of what he was saying one bit.

  • unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Did the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES really receive any material damage from reporting that occurred about him while he was PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES?

    • Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      This.

      Their formal response should be “no”.

      He can’t sue in British court and he’s forever saying how British and european institutions don’t have authority over American tech companies.

    • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Seriously. This seems performative. And how did they edit it exactly? Did they have him say things he didn’t fucking say?

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The documentary cut two sentences together that in reality were 50min apart, and made it seem like he explicitly ordered the assault on the Capitol. It was a bad misjudgment and it raises questions about how it made it to the air.

        • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          The dude uses only bad judgement, if any at all.

          I’m willing to handwave this away for the BBC, even if they did it on purpose

          Because fuck the fat idiot, who cares? He’s not even really people