Its way too prevalent and very weird. I guess it gives a great way to segue into the porn with setting up elaborate or ridiculous plot.
The normalization of having sex with cohabitating family/extended family is just… Weird. Probably shouldn’t be banned as a theme, but suppressed somehow. Maybe one in 100 advertised/served videos. I guess I am saying we need cancon for porn.
My sibling before christ. I wrote a comment leading with a controversial take and then explained my concerns. This does not police anyone. Or want to police. There is more to reality than just Saying you do you on all issues for you are free. Sometimes a conversation can be had.
People’s sex lives are already regulated. And some part of the regulation may be good. This is not a gay sex = bad kind of regulation. I feel like you are not engaging in good faith by blocking any and all conversation.
You were asked "why do you want to police people’s sex lives, you said “I don’t”, and every time you respond you’re talking about how you want it done.
I don’t think it should have been legal for that priest to rape me, probably we agree on that. I am in favor of policing people’s sex lives, obviously far less than you, but I can own it.
Controversial take: good.
Its way too prevalent and very weird. I guess it gives a great way to segue into the porn with setting up elaborate or ridiculous plot.
The normalization of having sex with cohabitating family/extended family is just… Weird. Probably shouldn’t be banned as a theme, but suppressed somehow. Maybe one in 100 advertised/served videos. I guess I am saying we need cancon for porn.
Controversial take: why do you want to police other people’s sex life. That’s creepy and weird.
I don’t.
You just announced your plan for regulating other people’s sex lives bruh
My sibling before christ. I wrote a comment leading with a controversial take and then explained my concerns. This does not police anyone. Or want to police. There is more to reality than just Saying you do you on all issues for you are free. Sometimes a conversation can be had.
You just said you’re in favor of regulating people’s sex lives, again.
It’ll be easier to have a good faith conversation with people if you’re not contradicting yourself.
People’s sex lives are already regulated. And some part of the regulation may be good. This is not a gay sex = bad kind of regulation. I feel like you are not engaging in good faith by blocking any and all conversation.
You were asked "why do you want to police people’s sex lives, you said “I don’t”, and every time you respond you’re talking about how you want it done.
I don’t think it should have been legal for that priest to rape me, probably we agree on that. I am in favor of policing people’s sex lives, obviously far less than you, but I can own it.