• Triumph@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I know it’s hard to remember, but DoJ operated separately from the White House back then.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s weird they’re so desperate. Clinton probably is in these files. All they have to do is wait and get the actual evidence.

            Instead they’re desperate to make shit up before it even materializes.

            • Triumph@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 day ago

              I also find it funny that they had “B-b-but Clinton fired the FBI director in 1993!” right at hand, but clearly had no idea why William Sessions was fired, because if they did, they’d know that their “b-b-but” was completely empty.

              For the record, yeah, Bill Clinton is kind of famous for having a loose weiner. Did he probably do other weiner stuff that we don’t know about? Absolutely. Did he diddle kids on Rape Island? Dunno. Not entirely out of the question. If there’s evidence, fucking nail him to the wall with the rest of them.

              What we know for sure is that there’s evidence of a whole bunch of well-known people having enjoyed the victims Epstein and Maxwell delivered to them. That evidence exists, and lots of people have seen it. We haven’t seen it; we may never see it. We may never know. You don’t always get to know what you should.

            • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              To me, if they had evidence he did ANYTHING illegal, they would have released it already. So far crickets.

              • Redacted@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                Imo the only reason they havent dumped all the D names is because theyre inextricably mixed with the R’s, probably in the same videos.

              • Serinus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                I dunno that I’d go that far. Maybe it’s hard to implicate Clinton without implicating Trump. Or maybe if Clinton suffers consequences, it’ll just make too much sense for Trump to suffer those same consequences. So they’re roped into protecting Clinton to protect Trump.

                Gotta save as many pedophiles as they can, I guess.

      • JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m aware it doesn’t say that, not sure why it’s desperate. Clinton was a frequent flyer on the lolita Express and was the president in 1996

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I feel like a lot of people are misinterpretting your comment because of the way republicans frequently use “clintonzes are evilzes!” as a distraction from their own much greater problems.

      I’d think the order wouldn’t come from clinton himself - gotta keep plausible deniability.

      But i definitely agree with you - it’s unsurprising that the FBI under clinton declined to investigate child pornography allegations against a child sex trafficker who has strong links to clinton.