- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Users are walking away from ChatGPT and calling it a political statement
You must log in or # to comment.
Meanwhile those of us who never used it in the first place: 🗿
There are lots of reasons not to use ChatGPT (or any AI) but it’s silly to think the consumer subscribers cancelling their subscriptions will make a dent. The real money is in the enterprise contracts. They only have a paywall to set limits on the overhead.
We can’t vote with anything but our wallets here, so this is a thing we can do to at least reduce their income. And considering they’re losing close to $100 million every day already, I can’t help but suspect nickel and diming them a bit still hurts.
It’s the kind of shit that can work long run. It worked against some AAA studios. I remember people saying that would never make a difference, but the sales numbers paint another story.
It just takes time to gain momentum.
What did basic chemistry stop working?
Meanwhile my centrist governor is proud to be the first state to adopt it. I love living in a fucking deep blue state captured by oligarchs.
From a previous discussion: QuitGPT reeks of something, and it’s not grass or roots.
- the website is AI-generated
- it is pro AI
- it is pro Big Tech
Most importantly, it’s a spinoff of a better movement that is anti-Google and, frankly, better:
local ai models you run on your own machine are better for your privacy, even if they’re nowhere as intelligent.
I’m pretty sure they’re exactly as “intelligent”: not at all
Get ollama and open web ui. Much better and more private.
Seems crazy to only be realizing they’re evil now, but I guess it’s something at least.
So… Some people were sure that “AI is bad” but still were using chatGPT?
Yes.
lol 🙄 that’s all i have to say to this
AI is fascism.
