• smiletolerantly@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    What a clown. In what world do you require an LLM to check for duplicate pictures??

    I mean, good on him for realizing that LLMs are dogshit. But still.

    • fafferlicious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      A good journalist does not just write for themselves, they must also write for the audience as the audience. They are the readers proxy and ask questions on behalf of the reader.

      Imagine a generic shmuck that has no idea ctrl +c and ctrl +v are hot keys.

      Now. Do you think they have any concept of what type of duplication tools exist? Do you think they’d just want to use this “super cool everything” software that AI is billed as? After all, it’s supposed to be smart right? They say it’s the next best thing and it’s almost like magic.


      Look, I’m not saying it’s a great article. But given all the bullshit hype regular people hear about AI. Is it really unreasonable to think “copilot, help me find duplicated files in my one drive” would be something good old Billy would try?

      Maybe it’s not a great article because there are better ways to de-duplicate photos. But that isn’t the fucking point of the article. The article is “look at how AI still fucking fails at basic shit we expect it to be good at.”

      And for that, I thank the author. We need way more of that.

    • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are people who can’t properly function without an llm. And it’s not just a few, a good bunch of humans have decided to leave the reasoning skills to a chatbot so they don’t have to do it.

      • Zephorah@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        This is both expected and mystifying at the same time.

        How dead in the head do you have to be to RELY on such things?

        • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I used to work as a software trainer at a big corporation. More than half don’t understand file structures or keyboard hotkeys or can even distinguish a web browser from their file explorer.

        • Tynan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Humans are historically pretty good at offloading mental capacity to some sort of tool in order to tackle larger and more complex problems. Consider solving a math problem mentally. Compare that to the kind of problem you would be able to some with a pen and paper. Then consider what you could do with a pen and paper and a calculator. An LLM purports to be all of that, and more, for any subject. It doesn’t matter that the results are often horrifically wrong, once they’ve offloaded the entirety of their mental capacity to the magic box and refocused their attention somewhere else.

      • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s because people get mislead by the “agent”, assuming there’s something actually intelligent at the other end, able to act like they would, just… Automated.

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          This is because the advertising for LLMs present them as if they were intelligent.

          LLMs are being promoted as a tool that can do anything even though the only thing they do well is output text that resembles human patterns. It is a hammer and they are pretending everything is a nail.

  • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m well aware that there are “dedupe” services out there, but I’m still very leery of giving a third-party service access to the entirety of my cloud backups. So, when I saw that Microsoft now offers the ability to send Copilot agents into your OneDrive files (version 1.0!), I thought, hey, this was worth checking out. It was time for a good spring cleaning of my cloud storage.

    If he was “leery of giving a third-party service access to the entirety of my cloud backups”, why would he trust hallucinating and unpredictable software more than a deterministic and fully predictable software.

    You just did the opposite of what would be a much safer option 🤦

    Can any technically illiterate moron write articles for a pc magazine? Senior editor no less…

    • kinsnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Differently types of risks. Giving a 3rd party access to your full cloud storage has massive privacy concerns that he is right to want to avoid.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Nothing wrong with laziness. There are a small number of cases where it improves productivity. None I’ve found so far on my job, but I know people who use it effectively.

        But anyone who gives an LLM access to do something that might be costly or risky to reverse is a drooling imbecile who shouldn’t be allowed to eat soup without being watched by an attendant.